MAS updated the guide to digital token offerings under the Securities and Futures Act (SFA). MAS provides general guidance on the application of the relevant laws in relation to offers or issues of digital tokens in Singapore. The guide includes case studies to illustrate how the relevant laws administered by MAS may apply to offers or issues of digital tokens.
The content of this guide is not exhaustive, has no legal effect, and does not modify or supersede any applicable laws, regulations, or requirements. Offers or issues of digital tokens may be regulated by MAS if the digital tokens are capital markets products under the SFA. Capital markets products include any securities, units in a collective investment scheme, derivatives contracts, and spot foreign exchange contracts for purposes of leveraged foreign exchange trading. MAS will examine the structure and characteristics of, including the rights attached to, a digital token in determining if the digital token is a type of capital markets product under the SFA.
The guide also includes information on application of sandbox criteria on digital tokens that are regulated by MAS. Any firm that is applying technology in an innovative way to provide financial services that are regulated by MAS can apply for the regulatory sandbox. MAS expects that interested firms would have done their due diligence, such as testing the proposed financial service in a laboratory environment and knowing the legal and regulatory requirements for deploying the proposed financial service, prior to submitting an application. If an application is approved, MAS will provide the appropriate regulatory support by relaxing specific legal and regulatory requirements prescribed by MAS, which the applicant would otherwise be subject to, for the duration of the sandbox.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Securities, Digital Token Offerings, SFA, Fintech, Regulatory Sandbox, Crypto-Assets, MAS
Previous ArticleFSB Publishes Directory of Crypto-Asset Regulators
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).