APRA released the results of a review of remuneration practices at large financial institutions. The findings reveal considerable room for improvement in the design and implementation of executive remuneration structures.
The review found that remuneration frameworks and practices did not consistently and effectively promote sound risk management and long-term financial soundness; they fell short of the better practices set out in the existing guidance of APRA. The report identified the need for improvement in:
- Ensuring practices were adopted that were appropriate to the size, complexity, and risk profile of an institution
- The extent to which risk outcomes were assessed, and weighted, within performance scorecards
- Enforcement of accountability mechanisms in response to poor risk outcomes
- Evidence of the rationale for remuneration decisions
Chairman Wayne Byres said APRA encouraged all regulated institutions to review their remuneration frameworks and address any areas where the findings indicated room for improvement. "Both the design and implementation of performance-based remuneration must support effective risk management and the long-term financial soundness of each institution. In this regard, there is considerable room for improvement," Mr. Byres said. In response to the findings, APRA will consider ways to strengthen its prudential framework. A future review of the relevant prudential standards and guidance will take account of the forthcoming Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) as well as the international best practices. Any revisions to the prudential framework will be subject to APRA’s usual practices of stakeholder consultation and engagement.
The APRA review comprised detailed analysis of executive remuneration practices and outcomes from a sample of 12 regulated institutions across the authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurance, and superannuation sectors. The sample of institutions reviewed collectively accounts for a material proportion of the total assets of the Australian financial system.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Remuneration, Best Practices, APRA
Previous ArticleFED Publishes Federal Register Notice on Reporting Form FR Y-9
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the March 31, 2020 interim final rule that provides a five-year transition period for the impact of the current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology on regulatory capital.
ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.
FINMA published guidance (06/2020) on extending or discontinuing various exemptions that were granted due to the COVID-19 crisis.
SRB launched a consultation on the minimum data needed for valuation of a bank in resolution.