APRA released the results of a review of remuneration practices at large financial institutions. The findings reveal considerable room for improvement in the design and implementation of executive remuneration structures.
The review found that remuneration frameworks and practices did not consistently and effectively promote sound risk management and long-term financial soundness; they fell short of the better practices set out in the existing guidance of APRA. The report identified the need for improvement in:
- Ensuring practices were adopted that were appropriate to the size, complexity, and risk profile of an institution
- The extent to which risk outcomes were assessed, and weighted, within performance scorecards
- Enforcement of accountability mechanisms in response to poor risk outcomes
- Evidence of the rationale for remuneration decisions
Chairman Wayne Byres said APRA encouraged all regulated institutions to review their remuneration frameworks and address any areas where the findings indicated room for improvement. "Both the design and implementation of performance-based remuneration must support effective risk management and the long-term financial soundness of each institution. In this regard, there is considerable room for improvement," Mr. Byres said. In response to the findings, APRA will consider ways to strengthen its prudential framework. A future review of the relevant prudential standards and guidance will take account of the forthcoming Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) as well as the international best practices. Any revisions to the prudential framework will be subject to APRA’s usual practices of stakeholder consultation and engagement.
The APRA review comprised detailed analysis of executive remuneration practices and outcomes from a sample of 12 regulated institutions across the authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurance, and superannuation sectors. The sample of institutions reviewed collectively accounts for a material proportion of the total assets of the Australian financial system.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Remuneration, Best Practices, APRA
Previous ArticleFED Publishes Federal Register Notice on Reporting Form FR Y-9
BoE published a statistical notice (Notice 2020/9) explaining the approach for treatment of payment holidays on the profit and loss return or Form PL.
BoE updated the known issues document for the statistical reporting Forms AS and FV.
FED announced individual capital requirements for 34 large banks and these requirements go into effect on October 01, 2020.
SRB published a set of documents to give operational guidance to banks on implementation of the bail-in tool.
BIS published an update on the G20 TechSprint Initiative, which was launched in April 2020 and aims to highlight the potential for technologies to resolve regulatory compliance (regtech) and supervisory (suptech) challenges.
OSFI published a letter that provides an update on the milestones for the implementation of the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts.
EBA updated the report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.