US Agencies (FED, FDIC, NCUA, and OCC) issued frequently asked questions (FAQs) on the new accounting standard for credit losses, in an effort to assist institutions and examiners. The FAQs focus on the application of the current expected credit losses methodology (CECL) for estimating credit loss allowances and related supervisory expectations and regulatory reporting guidance. The periodic issuance and updating of the FAQs is part of the efforts by the US Agencies to support institutions as they prepare to implement CECL.
The FAQ document also includes the questions and answers issued in September 2017 and December 2016. US Agencies published nine additional questions, updated responses to four existing questions, and added an appendix with links to relevant resources that are available to banks for help with the implementation of CECL. The nine additional FAQs cover the following topics:
- Consideration of stress testing models, scenarios, and forecast periods when forecasting future economic conditions for CECL
- Accounting implementation issues related to expected future changes in collateral when using the collateral-dependent practical expedient and related to the borrower payment behaviors as a risk characteristic for credit card portfolios
- Internal control considerations for CECL implementation
- Clarification of US Agencies’ use of the term “smaller and less complex” related to the scalability of CECL
- Concepts in existing interagency policy statements related to the allowance for loan and lease losses that remain relevant
The four updated responses pertain to the existing questions 4, 18, 34, and 35. The updated responses reflect the new effective date for nonpublic business entities as announced in the FASB Accounting Standard Update 2018-19, titled “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses” and issued in November 2018; the updated responses also reflect the final rule that modifies regulatory capital rules. The new standard takes effect in 2020, 2021, or 2022, depending on the characteristics of an institution.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Accounting, CECL, IFRS 9, FAQ, Credit Risk, Financial Instruments, US Agencies
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting