EBA published detailed guidance on the treatment of legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments to be applied before June 30, 2020, in light of the COVID-19 crisis. However, EBA may extend this time limit at a late stage, should this be considered necessary. The guidelines are intended to clarify the requirements for public and private moratoria, which, if fulfilled, will help avoid classification of exposures under the definition of forbearance or as defaulted under distressed restructuring. The guidelines apply from the date of translation of the guidelines into all EU languages. EBA also published a revised list of the institutions for supervisory reporting for 2020. The updated list is published around the first quarter of each year and these revisions constitute an annual exercise that is based on the institutions’ year-end data.
The guidelines have issued following the publication of the EBA statement on the application of the prudential framework regarding default, forbearance, and IFRS 9, in light of COVID-19 measures. The guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria apply in relation to the application of the definition of default in accordance with Article 178 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and classification of forbearance in accordance with Article 47b of CRR. These guidelines are addressed to competent authorities as defined in point (i) of Article 4(2) of EU Regulation No 1093/2010 and to credit institutions as defined in point (1) of Article 4(1) of CRR. These guidelines supplement the EBA guidelines on the application of the definition of default as regards the treatment of distressed restructuring.
EBA sees the payment moratoria as effective tools to address short-term liquidity difficulties caused by the limited or suspended operation of many businesses and individuals, resulting from the impact of COVID-19. In this context, the guidelines clarify that payment moratoria do not trigger classification as forbearance or distressed restructuring if the measures taken are based on the applicable national law, or on an industry or sector-wide private initiative agreed and applied broadly by the relevant credit institutions. In addition, the guidelines recall that institutions must continue to adequately identify the situations where borrowers may face longer-term financial difficulties and classify exposures in accordance with the existing regulation. The requirements for identification of forborne exposures and defaulted obligors remain in place.
The guidelines also state that, to allow effective monitoring of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the application of response measures, it is necessary for institutions to collect information about the scope and effects of the use of the moratoria. Institutions are expected to make use of the general payment moratoria in a transparent manner, providing relevant information to their competent authorities, while specific disclosure requirements to the public will be published later.
- Press Release Related to EBA Guideline
- EBA Guideline (PDF)
- Press Release Related to Reporting Institutions
- List of Reporting Institutions (XLSX)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Guideline, CRR, Reporting, Credit Risk, NPLs, IFRS 9, Loan Classification, EBA
Previous ArticleBundesbank Updates Derivation Rules for Bank Reporting
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).