EBA published detailed guidance on the treatment of legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments to be applied before June 30, 2020, in light of the COVID-19 crisis. However, EBA may extend this time limit at a late stage, should this be considered necessary. The guidelines are intended to clarify the requirements for public and private moratoria, which, if fulfilled, will help avoid classification of exposures under the definition of forbearance or as defaulted under distressed restructuring. The guidelines apply from the date of translation of the guidelines into all EU languages. EBA also published a revised list of the institutions for supervisory reporting for 2020. The updated list is published around the first quarter of each year and these revisions constitute an annual exercise that is based on the institutions’ year-end data.
The guidelines have issued following the publication of the EBA statement on the application of the prudential framework regarding default, forbearance, and IFRS 9, in light of COVID-19 measures. The guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria apply in relation to the application of the definition of default in accordance with Article 178 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and classification of forbearance in accordance with Article 47b of CRR. These guidelines are addressed to competent authorities as defined in point (i) of Article 4(2) of EU Regulation No 1093/2010 and to credit institutions as defined in point (1) of Article 4(1) of CRR. These guidelines supplement the EBA guidelines on the application of the definition of default as regards the treatment of distressed restructuring.
EBA sees the payment moratoria as effective tools to address short-term liquidity difficulties caused by the limited or suspended operation of many businesses and individuals, resulting from the impact of COVID-19. In this context, the guidelines clarify that payment moratoria do not trigger classification as forbearance or distressed restructuring if the measures taken are based on the applicable national law, or on an industry or sector-wide private initiative agreed and applied broadly by the relevant credit institutions. In addition, the guidelines recall that institutions must continue to adequately identify the situations where borrowers may face longer-term financial difficulties and classify exposures in accordance with the existing regulation. The requirements for identification of forborne exposures and defaulted obligors remain in place.
The guidelines also state that, to allow effective monitoring of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the application of response measures, it is necessary for institutions to collect information about the scope and effects of the use of the moratoria. Institutions are expected to make use of the general payment moratoria in a transparent manner, providing relevant information to their competent authorities, while specific disclosure requirements to the public will be published later.
- Press Release Related to EBA Guideline
- EBA Guideline (PDF)
- Press Release Related to Reporting Institutions
- List of Reporting Institutions (XLSX)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Guideline, CRR, Reporting, Credit Risk, NPLs, IFRS 9, Loan Classification, EBA
Previous ArticleBundesbank Updates Derivation Rules for Bank Reporting
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.