ESAs published a Joint Committee report on risks and vulnerabilities in the EU financial system. The report highlights uncertainties about the terms of the Brexit and describes the policy actions being called for by ESAs.
In light of the ongoing uncertainties, especially those around Brexit, supervisory vigilance and cooperation across all sectors remain key. Therefore, ESAs call for the following policy actions by European and national competent authorities as well as financial institutions:
- Contingency Plans—It is crucial that EU financial institutions, market participants, and their counterparties enact timely contingency plans to prepare for Brexit, including possible market volatility a no-deal Brexit may trigger. ESAs are closely monitoring Brexit developments and the possible associated risks of a no-deal scenario. In this regard, ESAs issued opinions and recommendations to provide important guidance for financial institutions, market participants, and national competent authorities.
- Stress Tests—Against the backdrop of the potential for sudden risk premia reversals with a risk of rising funding costs, the development and regular use of stress tests across all sectors remain crucial. Therefore, scenarios for the 2018 bank and insurance stress tests, which are conducted by EBA and EIOPA, reflected these risks. Furthermore, ESMA will present guidelines on fund liquidity and Money Market Fund stress testing during 2019. ESMA is also preparing its next central counterparties (CCPs) stress test. EBA has started to prepare the methodology for its 2020 stress test exercise and EIOPA launched its 2019 Occupational Pensions Stress Test.
- Lending by Banks—Banks should develop strategies to carefully manage and address large refinancing needs, including building loss-absorbing capacity. In addition, banks should continue with efforts to address the stocks of non-performing loans (NPLs) and should review their business model to improve profitability. Banks must also carefully manage their credit risk and interest rate risk. New bank lending has started to increase and warrants close monitoring of credit quality trends of new lending portfolios. Banks need to ensure that lending standards and covenant requirements do not weaken. The financial sector and banks, in particular, need to carefully manage their sovereign exposure, which might imply a significant impact on their profitability and capital.
- Insurance Sector—Supervisors and insurance companies must ensure that risks of a potentially sudden reassessment of risk premia and continued low interest rates are properly monitored and analyzed while taking appropriate mitigating actions. In this context, the vulnerabilities identified in the 2018 insurance stress test by EIOPA need to be addressed.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Brexit, Stress Testing, NPLs, ESAs
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.