BoM recently revised a couple of guideline documents for banks and signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with BSP, the central bank of Philippines. The MOU, which took effect on March 01, 2021, covers cooperation in the development of banking and payment systems, fintech, cybersecurity, and sustainable central banking. One of the published guidelines addresses revisions to BoM's approach to the recognition process of External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs) and the use of eligible ECAIs by banks, including as part of the standardized approach to credit risk; the revised guideline shall become effective as from April 01, 2021. The other revised guideline addresses certain requirements that banks would need to be follow in respect of their cross-border exposure.
This guideline on recognition and use of ECAIs covers the recognition of ECAIs, the principles for consistent use of credit assessments of ECAIs, and the use of Export Credit Agencies (ECAs). The guideline sets out minimum requirements for each of the six eligibility criteria for recognition of ECAIs, including objectivity, independence, international access/transparency, disclosure, resources, and credibility. Only the credit assessments of eligible ECAIs shall qualify for the standardized approach to credit risk. BoM can use both direct and indirect recognition methods for ECAIs. An application to recognize an ECAI may be initiated by a bank intending to use its ratings under the standardized approach to credit risk, or by an ECAI itself. The BoM guideline on standardized approach to credit risk permits banks to use consensus country risk scores of ECAs to determine risk-weights for claims on sovereigns, in cases where countries are not rated by eligible ECAIs. BoM has not set up a recognition process for ECAs equivalent to the one required for ECAIs. However, ECAs must publish their consensus country risk scores and subscribe to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)-agreed methodology, for these to qualify for calculating capital requirements under the standardized approach to credit risk.
The guideline on cross-border exposure provides a risk-based management framework to mitigate the key cross-border banking risks. BoM has issued several guidelines in respect of the identification, measurement, management, and mitigation of credit risk. These include the guideline on country risk management, the guideline on credit risk management, and the guideline on credit concentration risk. The guideline on cross-border exposure supplements these existing guidelines and provides a set of additional minimum standards that would need to be followed by banks in respect of their cross-border exposure. With respect to regulatory reporting, the guideline specifies that a bank shall immediately inform BoM when the bank is affected by a material increase in underlying risks such as credit, legal, or reputational risks in connection with its cross-border exposure or is approached by foreign authorities regarding such matters. BoM stipulates that banks shall fully implement the requirements of this guideline within three months from its effective date.
Keywords: Middle East and Africa, Mauritius, Banking, Credit Risk, Standardized Approach, Credit Ratings, ECAIs, Regulatory Capital, Basel, Cross-Border Exposures, Basel, BoM
Previous ArticleBOG Becomes Member of Basel Consultative Group
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.